• Analysis of environmental contaminants in different water matrices by HPLC-ICPMS/MS
    Figure 1: Analysis of environmental contaminants in different water matrices by HPLC-ICPMS/MS
  • Figure 2: separation of haloacetic acids in tap (A), ground (B), and river water (C) samples spiked with the EPA 552.2 certified reference material [2].

Liquid Chromatography

Analysis of environmental contaminants in different water matrices by HPLC-ICPMS/MS

Sep 24 2024

Halogenated acetic acids (HAAs) are among the most common water disinfection byproducts. Since these are presumably harmful to health, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates the levels of five haloacetic acids (monochloro-, dichloro-, trichloro-, monobromo- and dibromoacetic acid) to an overall maximum of 60 μg/L. The regulations of the European Union include another four haloacetic acids, with a maximum concentration of 80 μg/L for all nine HAAs combined [1].

High performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-MS/MS) is commonly used to achieve high sensitivity and selectivity. However, this detection technique is prone to matrix effects due to ion suppression or enhancement in the ionisation source. This application note will demonstrate the analysis of nine HAAs by using inductively coupled plasma tandem mass spectrometry (ICPMS/MS) for detection, which is less prone to matrix effects [2]. Different types of water samples from Austria were analysed using a YMC-Triart C18 column: tap water from Graz, groundwater from the Leutschach well and river water from the Mur.

Figure 1 shows the baseline separation of nine HAAs, each spiked with 2.0 mg/L EPA 552.2 reference material, in about 15 min. A high injection volume is used to achieve the lowest possible limit of detection (LOD). Therefore, the alkaline hard water samples (pH = 7.1–7.9) must be acidified to reduce the pH difference with the mobile phase.

The LOD ranges from 1.8–2.0 μg Cl/L and 1.0–1.5 μg Br/L, while the limit of quantification varies between 4.6 and 12 μg/L. The recoveries obtained show that ICPMS/MS detection is less prone to matrix effects compared to ESI-MS/MS because interfering ions with high carbon load (e.g. bicarbonate) are separated from the analytes as they elute with the dead volume. Therefore, an internal standard (IS) is not required unlike ESI-MS/MS, where an isotopically labelled IS for each analyte is preferable. Furthermore, ICPMS/MS detection can also be performed using non-volatile buffers containing phosphate, sulphate, chloride or sodium.

Find more informative applications on YMC’s homepage or download the YMC-Triart columns brochure for more details.

[1] European Parliament.Quality of water intended for human consumption ***I (accessed 08.2024)

[2] Bassam Lajin and Walter Goessler, Analytical Chemistry 2020 92 (13), 9156-9163, DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01456.


Digital Edition

Chromatography Today - Buyers' Guide 2022

October 2023

In This Edition Modern & Practical Applications - Accelerating ADC Development with Mass Spectrometry - Implementing High-Resolution Ion Mobility into Peptide Mapping Workflows Chromatogr...

View all digital editions

Events

Dioxin 2024

Sep 29 2024 Singapore

ISC 2024

Oct 06 2024 Liverpool, UK

AQE 2024

Oct 09 2024 Birmingham, UK

WWEM

Oct 09 2024 NEC, Birmingham, UK

SPICA 2024

Oct 15 2024 Milan, Italy

View all events